FUCK HOA's!!!!
Vet's Patriotic Stickers Under Fire
Published : Wednesday, 27 May 2009, 10:45 PM CDT
James Rose
DALLAS - Frank Larison is a disabled veteran with more than 14 years of service, including more than a year of combat duty in Vietnam.
The 58-year-old former Marine now finds himself under attack by his Dallas homeowners association for displaying seven decals on his vehicle supporting the Marine Corps.
"To me, it's being patriotic, and it shows that I served," the veteran told FOX 4.
The board says the decals are advertisements that violate HOA rules, and must be covered or removed.
Otherwise, the homeowners association for The Woodlands II on The Creek --- where Larimore has lived for eight years --- says in a letter it will tow the car at Larimore's expense. The board also threatens to fine him $50 for any future incident.
Larimore says the decals, ranging from the Marine emblem to Semper Fi slogans, aren't advertisements for anything. "You can't buy freedom," he reasoned.
Some neighbors are outraged.
"That is his identity," said neighbor Mary Castagna. "He goes to a lot of the veteran meetings, and it means a lot to him. Everyone else agrees with it; it doesn't bother anybody."
"He's in the Marines, and he's proud of it, and I don't blame him," said neighbor Paul Hardy. "If I'd gone through what he's gone through, I'd be kind of proud of it myself."
The letter from the board states you can't have any form of advertisement anywhere on your car on your property. FOX 4 cameras spotted bumper stickers for political parties, health causes, and other non-commercial interests on the property as well.
One board member said he was unaware the HOA presidents sent the letter and did not know of any issue with Larimore's vehicle.
"I will be looking into it," said board member Art Bradford. "I didn't know anything about this. I haven't seen this."
The board president was out of town and unavailable. The condo management company did not want to comment.
Thursday, May 28, 2009
Sunday, May 24, 2009
FBI Keeps Tabs on TEA Parties
Newsmax.com
FBI Keeps Tabs on TEA Parties
Thursday, May 21, 2009 2:25 PM
By: James H. Walsh
"The 'TEA Party' movement is an unhealthy mutation from public dissatisfaction with the Obama administration’s economic policies."
— David Axelrod, Senior White House Adviser, April 2009
Since when is free speech, as personified by the TEA (Taxed Enough Already) Party grass-roots citizens movement, “unhealthy”? Since the leftward tilt of federal agencies accelerated during the first 100 days of the Barack Obama presidency.
Consider, for instance, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which has moved far to the left on the political spectrum in record time under Secretary Janet Napolitano.
Consider also the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). The once fabled and incorruptible FBI is showing signs of becoming a mere “yes man” for the Obama administration.
Evidence for the yes-man charge is found in a recent report by the DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis Assessment (I&A), entitled, "Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment." The report names law-abiding U.S. citizens, who choose not to support the liberal agenda of the Obama administration, as prime subjects for FBI surveillance.
This Obama enemies list is a lengthy one, encompassing all “single-issue” advocates, including those who are pro-life, those who are gun owners, those who oppose illegal immigration, those who oppose “same -sex marriages” (such as Miss California), those who support third-party candidates, those who criticize free trade agreements, and, believe it or not, those military returning from Iraq and Afghanistan and those veterans still around.
A citizen-taxpayer who falls into several of these categories is even more likely to be targeted. The FBI appears to be following, in lockstep, the DHS agenda, in complete disregard for the constitutional rights of the citizenry. Lest the DHS, A&I, DOJ, and FBI forget, the U.S. Constitution protects the right to bear arms, the right to peaceful assembly, and free speech.
A similar DHS report, also prepared by the I&A, was withdrawn within hours of its release. Dated March 26, 2009, and entitled, “Domestic Extremism Lexicon,” it was a dictionary of political incorrectness. Its senior author was transferred to the DHS Office of the Director of National Intelligence, perhaps to prepare more and more anti-citizen reports.
FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III has chosen to stand with those who would denigrate U.S. citizens by failing to denounce the DHS "Rightwing Extremism" report. Instead he actively supports the goals of this controversial DHS report as well as those of the withdrawn DHS "Lexicon." The question arises, Who is left on the left to watch those foreign nationals who have sworn to destroy the United States?
No congressional investigation is underway regarding the origins of the DHS report or the withdrawn DHS "Lexicon." Apparently the DHS guidelines for these reports were White House approved.
The worst aspect of this sad state of affairs is that the FBI historically has been a strong, disciplined, and effective bureau that lived up to its motto of “Fidelity, Bravery, and Integrity.” For a century, countless books, articles, news accounts, movies, radio, and television shows have documented the Bureau as one of the world’s leading investigatory agencies. Now in 100 days, its proud history of crime fighting, spy-catching, civil-rights protecting, and domestic intelligence-gathering has been downgraded to political pandering and bureaucratic one-upmanship.
Extremists on the far left and on the far right have long found fault with the FBI for alleged privacy intrusions, especially when agents investigated wrong-doing by groups such as the U.S. Communist Party and the Ku Klux Klan. Ask any federal prosecutor, FBI agents were renowned for the quality of their background work in obtaining criminal convictions. But covering taxpayer protests? Come on.
The DHS "Rightwing Extremism" report admits that the I&A has no specific information that domestic rightwing terrorists (a term used in the report despite Napolitano’s new-think definition of terrorism as “man-caused disasters”) currently plan acts of violence. The report only suggests that “the election of the first African-American president presents unique drivers for rightwing radicalization and recruitment.”
Armed with this baseless and biased assessment, the FBI under Mueller swung into action to place the Tax Day TEA Parties of April 15, 2009, under federal surveillance.
Mueller alerted FBI field offices throughout the United States to verify the date, time, location, and organizers of each TEA Party within their jurisdiction and to supply that information to seat of government, that is, FBI headquarters in Washington, D.C. This request was issued two weeks before the DHS report was leaked to the California talk show.
Subsequently on April 6, 2009, FBI Headquarters advised its field offices to conduct cover surveillance and data collection of the protestors attending each TEA Party. The director’s advisory suggested that the surveillances were to be discreet and outside the purview of local law enforcement.
At the same time, the official FBI Web site carried the National Terror Suspect Watchlist, including the Most Wanted Terrorists, 24 of whom are foreign nationals, ranging from Osama bin Laden through Abdelkarim Hussein Mohamed Al-Nasser. Each person on the Most Wanted List is under indictment by federal grand juries in the United States. Not one of them was a right-wing extremist, and not one of them would waste their time attending a TEA Party.
The FBI Web site also posts the Ten Most Wanted Domestic Terrorists, again all of them under indictment by federal grand juries. At the top of the list is Ronald Stanley Bridgeforth, a member of the Black Liberation Army (BLA) wanted for killing a police officer and may be traveling in Africa. The other Top Ten include two more BLA members, several Animal Liberation Front (ALF) and Earth Liberation Front (ELF) members, a member of the May 19th Communist Organization, and several other domestic terrorists, among them Puerto Rican nationalists. All of them are to be considered armed and dangerous.
Note that the Ten Most Wanted domestic terrorists all lean left of center, with not a rightwing terrorist or TEA Party taxpayer among them.
The FBI, by carrying out the DHS directives regarding surveillance of each TEA Party held in March and April, 2009, diverted valuable resources, and more will be needed to cover each TEA Party being planned for the Fourth of July. The FBI owes U.S. taxpayers a detailed accounting of the human resources and monetary expenses required by TEA Party surveillances. President Obama has pledged transparency.
It is time to reassign FBI resources from TEA Party surveillances to updating the National Terror Suspect Watchlist. Mueller and his agency continue, however, to show signs of political correctness. Has the Obama administration so intimidated federal career officials that agencies, such as the FBI, have lost all sense of direction?
Federal resources needed to combat Islamist terrorists are being wasted spying on law-obeying, taxpaying citizens. Enemy list surveillances are the building stones of a dictatorship. U.S. citizens, awake! Do not let future historians say that this all happened while we slept.
James H. Walsh is a former federal prosecutor and former Associate General Counsel of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, U.S. Department of Justice.
FBI Keeps Tabs on TEA Parties
Thursday, May 21, 2009 2:25 PM
By: James H. Walsh
"The 'TEA Party' movement is an unhealthy mutation from public dissatisfaction with the Obama administration’s economic policies."
— David Axelrod, Senior White House Adviser, April 2009
Since when is free speech, as personified by the TEA (Taxed Enough Already) Party grass-roots citizens movement, “unhealthy”? Since the leftward tilt of federal agencies accelerated during the first 100 days of the Barack Obama presidency.
Consider, for instance, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which has moved far to the left on the political spectrum in record time under Secretary Janet Napolitano.
Consider also the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). The once fabled and incorruptible FBI is showing signs of becoming a mere “yes man” for the Obama administration.
Evidence for the yes-man charge is found in a recent report by the DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis Assessment (I&A), entitled, "Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment." The report names law-abiding U.S. citizens, who choose not to support the liberal agenda of the Obama administration, as prime subjects for FBI surveillance.
This Obama enemies list is a lengthy one, encompassing all “single-issue” advocates, including those who are pro-life, those who are gun owners, those who oppose illegal immigration, those who oppose “same -sex marriages” (such as Miss California), those who support third-party candidates, those who criticize free trade agreements, and, believe it or not, those military returning from Iraq and Afghanistan and those veterans still around.
A citizen-taxpayer who falls into several of these categories is even more likely to be targeted. The FBI appears to be following, in lockstep, the DHS agenda, in complete disregard for the constitutional rights of the citizenry. Lest the DHS, A&I, DOJ, and FBI forget, the U.S. Constitution protects the right to bear arms, the right to peaceful assembly, and free speech.
A similar DHS report, also prepared by the I&A, was withdrawn within hours of its release. Dated March 26, 2009, and entitled, “Domestic Extremism Lexicon,” it was a dictionary of political incorrectness. Its senior author was transferred to the DHS Office of the Director of National Intelligence, perhaps to prepare more and more anti-citizen reports.
FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III has chosen to stand with those who would denigrate U.S. citizens by failing to denounce the DHS "Rightwing Extremism" report. Instead he actively supports the goals of this controversial DHS report as well as those of the withdrawn DHS "Lexicon." The question arises, Who is left on the left to watch those foreign nationals who have sworn to destroy the United States?
No congressional investigation is underway regarding the origins of the DHS report or the withdrawn DHS "Lexicon." Apparently the DHS guidelines for these reports were White House approved.
The worst aspect of this sad state of affairs is that the FBI historically has been a strong, disciplined, and effective bureau that lived up to its motto of “Fidelity, Bravery, and Integrity.” For a century, countless books, articles, news accounts, movies, radio, and television shows have documented the Bureau as one of the world’s leading investigatory agencies. Now in 100 days, its proud history of crime fighting, spy-catching, civil-rights protecting, and domestic intelligence-gathering has been downgraded to political pandering and bureaucratic one-upmanship.
Extremists on the far left and on the far right have long found fault with the FBI for alleged privacy intrusions, especially when agents investigated wrong-doing by groups such as the U.S. Communist Party and the Ku Klux Klan. Ask any federal prosecutor, FBI agents were renowned for the quality of their background work in obtaining criminal convictions. But covering taxpayer protests? Come on.
The DHS "Rightwing Extremism" report admits that the I&A has no specific information that domestic rightwing terrorists (a term used in the report despite Napolitano’s new-think definition of terrorism as “man-caused disasters”) currently plan acts of violence. The report only suggests that “the election of the first African-American president presents unique drivers for rightwing radicalization and recruitment.”
Armed with this baseless and biased assessment, the FBI under Mueller swung into action to place the Tax Day TEA Parties of April 15, 2009, under federal surveillance.
Mueller alerted FBI field offices throughout the United States to verify the date, time, location, and organizers of each TEA Party within their jurisdiction and to supply that information to seat of government, that is, FBI headquarters in Washington, D.C. This request was issued two weeks before the DHS report was leaked to the California talk show.
Subsequently on April 6, 2009, FBI Headquarters advised its field offices to conduct cover surveillance and data collection of the protestors attending each TEA Party. The director’s advisory suggested that the surveillances were to be discreet and outside the purview of local law enforcement.
At the same time, the official FBI Web site carried the National Terror Suspect Watchlist, including the Most Wanted Terrorists, 24 of whom are foreign nationals, ranging from Osama bin Laden through Abdelkarim Hussein Mohamed Al-Nasser. Each person on the Most Wanted List is under indictment by federal grand juries in the United States. Not one of them was a right-wing extremist, and not one of them would waste their time attending a TEA Party.
The FBI Web site also posts the Ten Most Wanted Domestic Terrorists, again all of them under indictment by federal grand juries. At the top of the list is Ronald Stanley Bridgeforth, a member of the Black Liberation Army (BLA) wanted for killing a police officer and may be traveling in Africa. The other Top Ten include two more BLA members, several Animal Liberation Front (ALF) and Earth Liberation Front (ELF) members, a member of the May 19th Communist Organization, and several other domestic terrorists, among them Puerto Rican nationalists. All of them are to be considered armed and dangerous.
Note that the Ten Most Wanted domestic terrorists all lean left of center, with not a rightwing terrorist or TEA Party taxpayer among them.
The FBI, by carrying out the DHS directives regarding surveillance of each TEA Party held in March and April, 2009, diverted valuable resources, and more will be needed to cover each TEA Party being planned for the Fourth of July. The FBI owes U.S. taxpayers a detailed accounting of the human resources and monetary expenses required by TEA Party surveillances. President Obama has pledged transparency.
It is time to reassign FBI resources from TEA Party surveillances to updating the National Terror Suspect Watchlist. Mueller and his agency continue, however, to show signs of political correctness. Has the Obama administration so intimidated federal career officials that agencies, such as the FBI, have lost all sense of direction?
Federal resources needed to combat Islamist terrorists are being wasted spying on law-obeying, taxpaying citizens. Enemy list surveillances are the building stones of a dictatorship. U.S. citizens, awake! Do not let future historians say that this all happened while we slept.
James H. Walsh is a former federal prosecutor and former Associate General Counsel of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, U.S. Department of Justice.
Friday, May 15, 2009
Thursday, May 14, 2009
Tea Parties In Danger?
I am starting to have some very serious concerns; perhaps fears’ a better choice of word, regarding the Tea Parties and the shadows that I see slowly emerging from behind them. Up for grabs are an estimated 500,000 to 1,000,000+ voters nationwide crying out for leadership and guidance. This is a heart stopping number to operatives and their associated political organizations. This voting bloc is rapidly becoming completely disenfranchised from the system with a total disdain for politicians and political candidates across all party lines. Political organizations with fancy 4-color letterheads and matching corporate offices as well as your usual shadowy political operatives can hardly resist the pull of said vacuum formed by this chasm and are, I fear, rushing in to ride heard on this group of disgruntled citizens.
My specific concern lies with the sudden influx of ‘nonpartisan organizations’ that want to ‘help organize’ the Tea Parties in many parts of the country. I belong to numerous online nationwide Tea Party groups and am hearing talk of ‘sponsorships’, of shadowy organizers, some with not-so-subtle political agendas, the very things that, in Illinois, seem to lead to corruption and the typical political shenanigans we’ve seen time and time again. I believe that we need to keep the focus of the Tea Parties on the people as individuals and to avoid turning these events into an organized political group.
Allow me to focus, for a moment, on the concept of what a sponsor means and why it’s a bad idea for the Tea Party. I am an auto-racing enthusiast. For me it's normal to see racing vehicles plastered over in sponsorship stickers. In exchange for funding, parts and supplies, the owner of the vehicle has agreed to place small advertisements on the vehicle for the public to view. The driver, wrapped in similar cloth patches all over his fire suit will, in media interviews, typically be obligated to mention, in glowing terms, said sponsors name and product. Thus the public sees and buys the sponsors product.
In auto-racing I believe this to be an acceptable and much-needed practice, as a racing vehicle owner usually cannot afford to support their vehicle without outside assistance. Imagine now, if you will, a Tea Party with a sponsor. Who selected this sponsor? What does this sponsor receive in return for their cooperation or donation? Perhaps your organizing entity chose some sponsor that you don't like or one whose views you do not share. What then? And what next?
Aside from city issued rally permits and a public address system I'm not sure I even comprehend why we need an organizing entity or sponsor. I don't know about you but all I need is a simple cardboard sign on a stick or possibly a flag of some sort and the determination to make it to a given location at a given time, to talk to my fellow citizens, to interact with the media, if they'll refrain long enough from interrupting some of us during interviews, of which I can call and notify of the event all by myself, perhaps some flyers to hand out to passersby. What else is really needed?
A committee of citizens, as opposed to professional organizers, could be formed to obtain the minimum legal and logistical support necessary to stage an event. Expenses can be compensated for the committee members by taking up donations at the events. We are, as a group and by our very nature, generous. With enough notice requesting donations to compensate for expenses and costs I doubt very much the committee members would be left with even minimal incurred debt.
I don't know about you but I don't need, nor wish to represent, an organization whose motives I am unsure of, that’s not been clearly explained to me, who might want to advocate limits or themes to a particular event. The worst-case scenario as I see it would be with these organizers eventually 'suggesting' to us what we could display on our signs and what types of flags we could fly in an effort to "maintain an image of continuity and unity". By the very nature of the Tea Party we are not a congruent, even tempered group, we are all individuals, each with our own individual grievances, dreams and political beliefs. I worry about the 2nd Amendment, many worry about the economy, pretty much everyone agrees on taxes and the excessive size of government while others choose to focus on abortion related issues. All of the preceding are valid points of view and all deserving of strong protest and outcry as well as our group’s undivided support. That is the very essence of what makes the Tea Party event such a unique and truly American experience.
And that is what scares those in power, the thought that I pray keeps them up at night: Their lack of governance over us.
If you do not believe that there was behind scenes nonsense at more than a few Tea Parties around the country allow me to tell of what I know happened at the local April 15 tax Day Tea Party at Federal Plaza in Chicago. There were several issues involving who was going to speak at the event. In fact, at one point, the list was changing so often that it stopped being published on the Facebook event page. As an example a West Suburban individual who has very recently registered every conceivable combination of their name combined with the words ‘for governor.com, .net, .us. etc.,’ wanted very much to speak at the April 15 Chicago event however word leaked out and the general public consensus, right or wrong, was that this individual was going to announce their candidacy, or least the formation of a campaign exploratory group, for state governor during that speech. Rumor has it that the only reason they were removed from the speakers list was because of the subsequent public outcry regarding the potential or implied partisanship. What if these rumors had never surfaced thus preventing any public outcry, would the organizers still have allowed this person to proceed knowing of their intentions? The media would have had a field day!
Then there was the rancor of a pair of radio station talk-show hosts who were outraged because they were not allowed to speak at the event. I still don't have an answer as to why they were not allowed to speak while another competing radio talk show host was. Did you know that a hard-core conservative Republican publicly endorsed the April 15 Chicago event…I just found out on May 11th about that…
We, as citizens and voters, have been burned so many times in the past by those that we have elected with their false promises, hidden agendas, endless greed and ongoing corruption. I believe we need exercise extreme caution when requesting assistance or guidance from organized entities with regards to Tea Parties due to the consequences of overt or covert agendas that these relationships might entail.
In closing I suggest that any organization wishing to organize or ‘sponsor’ a Tea Party in the future be prepared for an unprecedented showing of transparency to, and ensuing due diligence by, the citizen attendees of these great Tea Parties. Only then can we keep the Tea Parties truly unique and nonpartisan. I know I'll be asking questions of and about these organizing entities and their ‘sponsors’.
Will you?
Readers of this post are strongly encouraged to post their comments and thoughts or you may contact the author directly via e-mail at illinoispatriot @ Hotmail.com.
Respectfully submitted,
H. K.
My specific concern lies with the sudden influx of ‘nonpartisan organizations’ that want to ‘help organize’ the Tea Parties in many parts of the country. I belong to numerous online nationwide Tea Party groups and am hearing talk of ‘sponsorships’, of shadowy organizers, some with not-so-subtle political agendas, the very things that, in Illinois, seem to lead to corruption and the typical political shenanigans we’ve seen time and time again. I believe that we need to keep the focus of the Tea Parties on the people as individuals and to avoid turning these events into an organized political group.
Allow me to focus, for a moment, on the concept of what a sponsor means and why it’s a bad idea for the Tea Party. I am an auto-racing enthusiast. For me it's normal to see racing vehicles plastered over in sponsorship stickers. In exchange for funding, parts and supplies, the owner of the vehicle has agreed to place small advertisements on the vehicle for the public to view. The driver, wrapped in similar cloth patches all over his fire suit will, in media interviews, typically be obligated to mention, in glowing terms, said sponsors name and product. Thus the public sees and buys the sponsors product.
In auto-racing I believe this to be an acceptable and much-needed practice, as a racing vehicle owner usually cannot afford to support their vehicle without outside assistance. Imagine now, if you will, a Tea Party with a sponsor. Who selected this sponsor? What does this sponsor receive in return for their cooperation or donation? Perhaps your organizing entity chose some sponsor that you don't like or one whose views you do not share. What then? And what next?
Aside from city issued rally permits and a public address system I'm not sure I even comprehend why we need an organizing entity or sponsor. I don't know about you but all I need is a simple cardboard sign on a stick or possibly a flag of some sort and the determination to make it to a given location at a given time, to talk to my fellow citizens, to interact with the media, if they'll refrain long enough from interrupting some of us during interviews, of which I can call and notify of the event all by myself, perhaps some flyers to hand out to passersby. What else is really needed?
A committee of citizens, as opposed to professional organizers, could be formed to obtain the minimum legal and logistical support necessary to stage an event. Expenses can be compensated for the committee members by taking up donations at the events. We are, as a group and by our very nature, generous. With enough notice requesting donations to compensate for expenses and costs I doubt very much the committee members would be left with even minimal incurred debt.
I don't know about you but I don't need, nor wish to represent, an organization whose motives I am unsure of, that’s not been clearly explained to me, who might want to advocate limits or themes to a particular event. The worst-case scenario as I see it would be with these organizers eventually 'suggesting' to us what we could display on our signs and what types of flags we could fly in an effort to "maintain an image of continuity and unity". By the very nature of the Tea Party we are not a congruent, even tempered group, we are all individuals, each with our own individual grievances, dreams and political beliefs. I worry about the 2nd Amendment, many worry about the economy, pretty much everyone agrees on taxes and the excessive size of government while others choose to focus on abortion related issues. All of the preceding are valid points of view and all deserving of strong protest and outcry as well as our group’s undivided support. That is the very essence of what makes the Tea Party event such a unique and truly American experience.
And that is what scares those in power, the thought that I pray keeps them up at night: Their lack of governance over us.
If you do not believe that there was behind scenes nonsense at more than a few Tea Parties around the country allow me to tell of what I know happened at the local April 15 tax Day Tea Party at Federal Plaza in Chicago. There were several issues involving who was going to speak at the event. In fact, at one point, the list was changing so often that it stopped being published on the Facebook event page. As an example a West Suburban individual who has very recently registered every conceivable combination of their name combined with the words ‘for governor.com, .net, .us. etc.,’ wanted very much to speak at the April 15 Chicago event however word leaked out and the general public consensus, right or wrong, was that this individual was going to announce their candidacy, or least the formation of a campaign exploratory group, for state governor during that speech. Rumor has it that the only reason they were removed from the speakers list was because of the subsequent public outcry regarding the potential or implied partisanship. What if these rumors had never surfaced thus preventing any public outcry, would the organizers still have allowed this person to proceed knowing of their intentions? The media would have had a field day!
Then there was the rancor of a pair of radio station talk-show hosts who were outraged because they were not allowed to speak at the event. I still don't have an answer as to why they were not allowed to speak while another competing radio talk show host was. Did you know that a hard-core conservative Republican publicly endorsed the April 15 Chicago event…I just found out on May 11th about that…
We, as citizens and voters, have been burned so many times in the past by those that we have elected with their false promises, hidden agendas, endless greed and ongoing corruption. I believe we need exercise extreme caution when requesting assistance or guidance from organized entities with regards to Tea Parties due to the consequences of overt or covert agendas that these relationships might entail.
In closing I suggest that any organization wishing to organize or ‘sponsor’ a Tea Party in the future be prepared for an unprecedented showing of transparency to, and ensuing due diligence by, the citizen attendees of these great Tea Parties. Only then can we keep the Tea Parties truly unique and nonpartisan. I know I'll be asking questions of and about these organizing entities and their ‘sponsors’.
Will you?
Readers of this post are strongly encouraged to post their comments and thoughts or you may contact the author directly via e-mail at illinoispatriot @ Hotmail.com.
Respectfully submitted,
H. K.
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
The Post Turtle
(Swiped from PatriotPost.us)
A doctor struck up a conversation with a hard-working 75 year old rancher while suturing a mean cut on the old man's leathery hand. Eventually the topic got around to Obama.
The old rancher said, "Well, you know, Obama is a 'post turtle.'"
Unfamiliar with the term, the doctor asked him what he meant.
The old rancher replied, "When you're driving down a country road and you come across a fence post with a turtle balanced on top, that's a 'post turtle.'"
The old rancher saw the puzzled look on the doctor's face so he continued: "You know he didn't get up there by himself, he doesn't belong up there, and he doesn't know what to do while he's up there, and you just wonder what kind of complete moron put him up there to begin with."
A doctor struck up a conversation with a hard-working 75 year old rancher while suturing a mean cut on the old man's leathery hand. Eventually the topic got around to Obama.
The old rancher said, "Well, you know, Obama is a 'post turtle.'"
Unfamiliar with the term, the doctor asked him what he meant.
The old rancher replied, "When you're driving down a country road and you come across a fence post with a turtle balanced on top, that's a 'post turtle.'"
The old rancher saw the puzzled look on the doctor's face so he continued: "You know he didn't get up there by himself, he doesn't belong up there, and he doesn't know what to do while he's up there, and you just wonder what kind of complete moron put him up there to begin with."
Oh My God! Supermax Prison Is (GASP!) Harsh! Say it Ain’t So!
At the Chicago Trib: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-0513edit1may13,0,3337700.story
My comments:
Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch are simply anti-American socio-marxist orgs that want to hold us to ideals created by the UN and Europe. America does not beholden itself to you, to anyone and specifically to your socialist belief structures. Stay out of our business!
Here is a simple two-step plan for us all to follow:
1. Don't commit crimes and you won't end up in prison.
2. Don't commit crimes in prison and you won't end up in Tamms.
Want some verified background on Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch?
Amnesty International: http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6185
Human Rights Watch: http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6258
My comments:
Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch are simply anti-American socio-marxist orgs that want to hold us to ideals created by the UN and Europe. America does not beholden itself to you, to anyone and specifically to your socialist belief structures. Stay out of our business!
Here is a simple two-step plan for us all to follow:
1. Don't commit crimes and you won't end up in prison.
2. Don't commit crimes in prison and you won't end up in Tamms.
Want some verified background on Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch?
Amnesty International: http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6185
Human Rights Watch: http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6258
Friday, May 8, 2009
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
